🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.