🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that smartphones and apps are "robbing our children's youth". Legislation could be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to pass a bill increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a similar move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for minors except if guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a useful starting point," stated a leading MEP driving the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong research".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration pledged to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who died after viewing dangerous social media material argues that a strict age ban may not protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to design products and services that are safe and suitable for minors," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the state level amid national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further use needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain individuals to follow the Australian example, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from these regions, further nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international organizations take a more nuanced position. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this international conversation evolves, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers globally are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.